Tempered Fractional Deterministic Learning for Online Battery State-of-Health Estimation: A Cycle-Level Benchmark Study
| dc.contributor.author | Kahouli, Omar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bahou ,Younès | |
| dc.contributor.author | Farah, Moawia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bouzida, Imed | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-13T07:46:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-13T07:46:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-05 | |
| dc.description | Li-ion batteries have found their way to be the most common energy-storage technology in electric vehicles due to their high-energy density, long cycle life, and desirable power characteristics. Their safe and efficient use, however, depends strongly on accurate estimation of key internal states, particularly the state of charge (SOC) and the state of health (SOH). Reliable SOH information is essential not only for range prediction and maintenance planning, but also for safety supervision, warranty management, energy management, and fleet-level decision support | |
| dc.description.abstract | Accurate battery state-of-health (SOH) estimation is essential for safe and reliable electric-vehicle operation. This paper presents a Tempered Fractional Deterministic Learning (TF-DL) framework that combines deterministic learning with a tempered fractional adaptation law to introduce tunable memory and graceful forgetting into SOH estimation. Two realizations are considered: an exact truncated variant (TF-DL-T) and an embedded low-memory variant (TF-DL-E). The framework is evaluated on a NASA-derived cycle-level battery aging benchmark with capacity-based SOH labels and a battery-level train/test split. After filtering, 14 batteries were retained, of which 9 were used for training and 5 unseen batteries were used for testing. Random Forest achieved the best overall performance (MAE = 0.0436, RMSE = 0.0496), while LSTM was the strongest sequence baseline (MAE = 0.0757, RMSE = 0.0920). Among the online RBF-based methods, TF-DL-E achieved the best performance (MAE = 0.0966, RMSE = 0.1077), outperforming GD-DL and TF-DL-T. Unlike offline methods, TF-DL-E operates online with constant memory, which makes it suitable for embedded battery management systems. The results indicate that TF-DL-E is the more robust and practically relevant tempered variant, whereas TF-DL-T remains more fragile and parameter-sensitive. Keywords: battery state of health; tempered fractional calculus; deterministic learning; electric vehicles; remaining useful life; battery management system | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Kahouli, O., Bahou, Y., Farah, M., & Bouzida, I. (2026). Tempered Fractional Deterministic Learning for Online Battery State-of-Health Estimation: A Cycle-Level Benchmark Study. Fractal and Fractional, 10(5), 331. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract10050331 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.adu.ac.ae/handle/1/8389 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | |
| dc.title | Tempered Fractional Deterministic Learning for Online Battery State-of-Health Estimation: A Cycle-Level Benchmark Study | |
| dc.type | Article |
