Runoff curve number and saturated hydraulic conductivity estimation via direct rainfall simulator measurements

dc.contributor.authorElhakeem, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorPapanicolaou, A.N.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-28T05:12:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-19T08:11:18Z
dc.date.available2022-03-28T05:12:23Z
dc.date.available2023-08-19T08:11:18Z
dc.date.issued2012-02
dc.description.abstractSurface runoff can be estimated directly from conceptual models such as the runoff curve number (RCN) method or indirectly from physically based infiltration models such as the Green-Ampt method (Ponce, 1989; McCuen, 2003; Mishra and Singh, 2003). Both methods are widely accepted models for predicting surface runoff in both agricultural and urbanized watersheds due to their simplicity and to the limited number of parameters required for runoff prediction. In addition, they have been integrated into many hydrologic, storm water management and water quality models such as the erosion productivity impact calculator EPIC (Sharpley and Williams, 1990), the soil and water assessment tool SWAT (Arnold et al., 1998), and the stormwater management model SWMM (Rossman et al., 2003). The key parameters involved in the RCN and the Green-Ampt methods are the runoff curve number (CN) and the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) respectively, which can be obtained from tables as functions of soil texture, management practice, and land use. The use of singular tabulated CN and Ksat values without verification can result in large errors in predicting surface runoff. Frequent flooding in the Midwest over the past two decades (e.g. 1993, 2008) has raised the need for revised CN and Ksat values to accurately estimate the surface runoff of different watersheds. In this present study, the authors estimated ranges of CN and Ksat values for the different hydrologic soil groups in Iowa, which was affected by devastating flooding in 2008 and 2011. Representative counties from Iowa with different soils were chosen to estimate the CN and Ksat values. This chapter describes detailed methodological steps to estimate in situ runoff CN and Ksat values from rainfall simulators. This is useful because the rainfall simulators eliminate the need for natural storm events, and their intensity can be adjusted during an experimental run to mimic natural rain.en_US
dc.identifier.citationElhakeem, M., & Papanicolaou, A. N. (2012). Runoff curve number and saturated hydraulic conductivity estimation via direct rainfall simulator measurements. Journal of Water Management Modeling.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.R245-09
dc.identifier.urihttps://edms.wexl.in/handle/1/3019
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherComputational Hydraulics Int.(CHI)en_US
dc.subjectSaturateden_US
dc.subjectHydraulicen_US
dc.subjectSimulator, Conceptual models , Storm water Managementen_US
dc.titleRunoff curve number and saturated hydraulic conductivity estimation via direct rainfall simulator measurementsen_US
dc.title.alternativeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Runoff Curve Number and Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Estimation via Direct Rainfall Simulator Measurements.pdf
Size:
1.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Runoff Curve Number and Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Estimation via Direct Rainfall Simulator Measurements

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: