Acetone–Gasoline Blend as an Alternative Fuel in SI Engines: A Novel Comparison of Performance, Emission, and Lube Oil Degradation

dc.contributor.authorM.,Usman
dc.contributor.authorT., Khan
dc.contributor.authorF.,Riaz
dc.contributor.authorA, Amjad M.T
dc.contributor.authorH, Shah M
dc.contributor.authorM, Ashraf W
dc.contributor.authorJ, Krzywanski
dc.contributor.authorW. Nowak
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-01T08:07:13Z
dc.date.available2024-02-01T08:07:13Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-13
dc.descriptionThe energy imbalance instigated by the excessive use of nonrenewable fuels in the automotive industry in specific and the industrial sector in general is an alarming issue. (1−5) Moreover, the shambolic state of global warming and pollution associated with exhaust emissions and engine lubricating oil disposal is equally unignorable. (6,7) Among all fuels, hydrocarbon fuel is majorly responsible for environmental pollution. (8) 18% of global primary energy is utilized by the transport sector and is primarily accountable for 23% of global CO2 emissions, eventually leading to consequences of global warming.
dc.description.abstractThe disproportionate use of petroleum products and stringent exhaust emissions has emphasized the need for alternative green fuels. Although several studies have been conducted to ascertain the performance of acetone–gasoline blends in spark-ignition (SI) engines, limited work has been done to determine the influence of fuel on lubricant oil deterioration. The current study fills the gap through lubricant oil testing by running the engine for 120 h on pure gasoline (G) and gasoline with 10% by volume acetone (A10). Compared to gasoline, A10 produced better results in 11.74 and 12.05% higher brake power (BP) and brake thermal efficiency (BTE), respectively, at a 6.72% lower brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC). The blended fuel A10 produced 56.54, 33.67, and 50% lower CO, CO2, and HC emissions. However, gasoline remained competitive due to lower oil deterioration than A10. The flash-point and kinematic viscosity, compared to fresh oil, decreased by 19.63 and 27.43% for G and 15.73 and 20.57% for A10, respectively. Similarly, G and A10 showed a decrease in total base number (TBN) by 17.98 and 31.46%, respectively. However, A10 is more detrimental to lubricating oil due to a 12, 5, 15, and 30% increase in metallic particles like aluminum, chromium, copper, and iron, respectively, compared to fresh oil. Performance additives like calcium and phosphorous in lubricant oil for A10 decreased by 10.04 and 4.04% in comparison to gasoline, respectively. The concentration of zinc was found to be 18.78% higher in A10 when compared with gasoline. A higher proportion of water molecules and metal particles were found in lubricant oil for A10. Keywords :Fossil fuels, Ketones, Lipids, Oxides, Redox reactions
dc.identifier.citationUsman, M., Khan, T., Riaz, F., Ijaz Malik, M. A., Amjad, M. T., Shah, M. H., ... & Nowak, W. (2023). Acetone–Gasoline Blend as an Alternative Fuel in SI Engines: A Novel Comparison of Performance, Emission, and Lube Oil Degradation. ACS omega, 8(12), 11267-11280.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c08271
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.adu.ac.ae/handle/1/696
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherACS Publication
dc.titleAcetone–Gasoline Blend as an Alternative Fuel in SI Engines: A Novel Comparison of Performance, Emission, and Lube Oil Degradation
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Acetone−Gasoline Blend.pdf
Size:
6.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: