The Difference between the Public Prosecution Intervention as a Principle Party and as a Joined Party in Civil Cases-Nationality suit as a model

dc.contributor.authoryassine.chami
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-17T11:21:12Z
dc.date.available2024-10-17T11:21:12Z
dc.date.issued2023-06
dc.description.abstractAlthough it is legally recognized that the Public Prosecution has inherent jurisdiction over criminal matters, the legislator provided this judicial body the procedural ability to intervene in civil proceedings, either as a principal party or as a joined party. This intervention aims to achieve the public interest and ensure the proper application of justice, due to the legal and political significance that civil cases represent at both the individual and collective levels. In this research, we will highlight the two forms of this intervention and determine the difference between them Focusing on nationality claims in Algerian legislation and comparative law. Keywords: Intervention, nationality, principal party, Public Prosecution
dc.identifier.citationYassine, C. (2023). The Difference between the Public Prosecution Intervention as a Principle Party and as a Joined Party in Civil Cases-Nationality suit as a model. مجلة العلوم القانونية والاجتماعية, 8(2), 98-110.‏
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.adu.ac.ae/handle/1/6773
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherASJP
dc.titleThe Difference between the Public Prosecution Intervention as a Principle Party and as a Joined Party in Civil Cases-Nationality suit as a model
dc.title.alternativeyasmin,chami
dc.typeArticle

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: