A Bibliometric Analysis of Objective and Subjective Risk

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorNobanee, Haitham
dc.contributor.authorAlhajjar, Maryam
dc.contributor.authorAhmed Alkaabi, Mohammed
dc.contributor.authorMusabah Almemari, Majed
dc.contributor.authorAbdulla Alhassani, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorKhamis Alkaabi, Naema
dc.contributor.authorAbdulla Alshamsi, Saeed
dc.contributor.authorHamed AlBlooshi, Hanan
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-01T11:35:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-19T09:01:55Z
dc.date.available2023-05-01T11:35:33Z
dc.date.available2023-08-19T09:01:55Z
dc.date.issued2021-07
dc.description.abstractIn relation to “objective risk” or “subjective risk”, a bibliometric analysis was performed using documents found in the Scopus database. A search for related documents was narrowed down to 192 documents and these were considered in this study. The results of this study suggest that the use of the ranking method and descriptive statistics is not sufficient in presenting a concise bibliometric analysis. To create a more in-depth bibliometric analysis, the results of this study have to be analyzed together with a visualization map using VOSviewer software. This way, researchers can easily locate a specific gap in the literature, understand the relation between the papers on the same subject, and cite the literature studies based on their effectiveness.
dc.identifier.citationNobanee, H., Alhajjar, M., Alkaabi, M. A., Almemari, M. M., Alhassani, M. A., Alkaabi, N. K., ... & AlBlooshi, H. H. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of objective and subjective risk. Risks, 9(7), 128.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/risks9070128
dc.identifier.urihttps://edms.wexl.in/handle/1/4822
dc.subjectObjective risk
dc.subjectSubjective risk
dc.subjectBarometric analysis
dc.subjectVOSviewer
dc.titleA Bibliometric Analysis of Objective and Subjective Risken_US
dcterms.abstract: In relation to “objective risk” or “subjective risk”, a bibliometric analysis was performed using documents found in the Scopus database. A search for related documents was narrowed down to 192 documents and these were considered in this study. The results of this study suggest that the use of the ranking method and descriptive statistics is not sufficient in presenting a concise bibliometric analysis. To create a more in-depth bibliometric analysis, the results of this study have to be analyzed together with a visualization map using VOSviewer software. This way, researchers can easily locate a specific gap in the literature, understand the relation between the papers on the same subject, and cite the literature studies based on their effectiveness.

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
risks-09-00128 (1).pdf
Size:
5.34 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
A Bibliometric Analysis of Objective and Subjective Risk
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Risk Management