Corporate social responsibility performance and social reputation via corporate social responsibility awarding: is there a threshold effect?

dc.contributor.authorKuzey, Cemil
dc.contributor.authorUyar, Ali
dc.contributor.authorOuld Daoud Ellili, Nejla
dc.contributor.authorKaraman, Abdullah S.
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-15T04:58:01Z
dc.date.available2025-09-15T04:58:01Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionCorporate social responsibility (CSR) has become increasingly important since the introduction of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) sustainability reporting framework in 2000 and the adoption of Sustainable Development Goals by the United Nations in 2015, as companies face growing pressure to demonstrate their commitment to social and environmental responsibilities (Husted and Allen, 2007).
dc.description.abstractPurpose This study aims to examine the potential threshold effect in the association between corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and social reputation. Design/methodology/approach This study includes an international and cross-sector sample covering 41 countries, nine sectors and 45,395 firm-year observations. It applies a parabolic relationship, rather than linear regressions, between CSR engagement and social reputation via CSR awarding. This implies that CSR performance should increase until a certain point to gain a social reputation but then should decrease after reaching that threshold point considering limited financial resources. Findings The findings of country-industry-year fixed-effects logistic regressions confirm the threshold effect with an inverted U-shaped relationship between CSR and CSR awarding. More specifically, firms increase their environmental and social engagement until a certain point, and then they reduce it after reaching a social reputation. This finding is confirmed by three dimensions of the environmental pillar (i.e. resource use, emissions and eco-innovation) as well as four dimensions of the social pillar (i.e. workforce, human rights, community and product responsibility). The findings are robust to alternative samples, alternative methodology and endogeneity concerns. Practical implications The findings of this study have implications for firms about the better allocation of available funds between CSR and operations. The findings could be particularly useful for CSR teams/committees of the firms who formulate CSR policies and how to mobilize firm resources for better social enhancement via environmental and social reputation. Originality/value This study examines deeper the nature of the association between CSR engagement and social reputation and considers the possibility of an inverted U-shaped relationship between them. The determination of a threshold effect suggests that CSR engagement increases social reputation, but once it reaches a certain point, social reputation will decrease owing to financial resource constraints. Keywords C33, G32, G34, CSR, Environmental performance, Social performance, CSR award, Threshold effect
dc.identifier.citationKuzey, C., Uyar, A., Ellili, N. O. D., & Karaman, A. S. (2024). Corporate social responsibility performance and social reputation via corporate social responsibility awarding: is there a threshold effect?. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 24(5), 993-1020.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2023-0128
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.adu.ac.ae/handle/1/7450
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEmerald
dc.titleCorporate social responsibility performance and social reputation via corporate social responsibility awarding: is there a threshold effect?
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Corporate social responsibility.pdf
Size:
326.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: