Development of renewable resource–based cellulose acetate bioplastic: Effect of process engineering on the performance of cellulosic plastics

dc.contributor.authorDrzal, LT
dc.contributor.authorMohanty, AK
dc.contributor.authorArief C, Wibowo
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-08T14:48:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-19T09:06:06Z
dc.date.available2022-01-08T14:48:10Z
dc.date.available2023-08-19T09:06:06Z
dc.date.issued2003-05
dc.descriptionThis paper deals with the development of a cellulose acetate biopolymer. Plasticization of this biopolymer under varying processing conditions to make it a suitable matrix polymer for bio‐composite applications was studied. In particular, cellulose acetate was plasticized with varying concentrations of an eco‐friendly triethyl citrate (TEC) plasticizer, unlike a conventional, petroleum‐derived phthalate plasticizer. Three types of processing were used to fabricate plasticized cellulose acetate parts: compression molding, extrusion followed by compression molding, and extrusion followed by injection molding. The processing mode affected the physicomechanical and thermal properties of the cellulosic plastic. Compression molded samples exhibited the highest impact strength, tending towards the impact strength of a thermoplastic olefin (TPO), while samples that were extruded and then injection molded exhibited theen_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract This paper deals with the development of a cellulose acetate biopolymer. Plasticization of this biopolymer under varying processing conditions to make it a suitable matrix polymer for bio-composite applications was studied. In particular, cellulose acetate was plasticized with varying concentrations of an eco-friendly triethyl citrate (TEC) plasticizer, unlike a conventional, petroleum-derived phthalate plasticizer. Three types of processing were used to fabricate plasticized cellulose acetate parts: compression molding, extrusion followed by compression molding, and extrusion followed by injection molding. The processing mode affected the physicomechanical and thermal properties of the cellulosic plastic. Compression molded samples exhibited the highest impact strength, tending towards the impact strength of a thermoplastic olefin (TPO), while samples that were extruded and then injection molded exhibited the highest tensile strength and modulus values. Increasing the plasticizer content in the cellulosic plastic formulation improved the impact strength and strain to failure while decreasing the tensile strength and modulus values. The coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the cellulose acetate increased with increasing amounts of plasticizer. Plasticized cellulose acetate was found to be processable at 170–180°C, approximately 50°C below the melting point of neat cellulose acetate.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMohanty, A. K., Wibowo, A., Misra, M., & Drzal, L. T. (2003). Development of renewable resource–based cellulose acetate bioplastic: Effect of process engineering on the performance of cellulosic plastics. Polymer Engineering & Science, 43(5), 1151-1161.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/pen.10097
dc.identifier.urihttps://edms.wexl.in/handle/1/2202
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subjectResource–baseden_US
dc.subjectEffect of process engineeringen_US
dc.subjectPerformance of cellulosic plasticsen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of renewable resource–based cellulose acetate bioplastic: Effect of process engineering on the performance of cellulosic plasticsen_US
dc.title.alternativePolymer Engineering & Scienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections