Evaluating the impacts on runoff of landscape-based Best Management Practices in a rain-fed agroecosystem of the US Midwest

dc.contributor.authorThanos, Papanicolaou
dc.contributor.authorElhakeem, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorWilson, C.G.
dc.contributor.authorETAL..
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-05T05:28:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-19T08:11:38Z
dc.date.available2022-04-05T05:28:00Z
dc.date.available2023-08-19T08:11:38Z
dc.date.issued2010-12
dc.description.abstractConversion of the natural prairie-forested landscape in US Midwestern states to a corn-soybean crop rotation has altered the runoff condition and stream hydrology throughout the region by creating more dynamic surface water flow regimes and increasing the likelihood of severe floods. Flooding and the associated water quality issues in the region adversely affect crop yields, downstream ecosystem health, and water availability. In response to these concerns, Midwestern agricultural producers have adopted Best Management Practices (BMPs) to increase runoff retention and reduce sediment delivery. Common BMPs in the region are Grassed WaterWays (GWWs), which have been found to effectively reduce runoff/sediment conveyance by slowing water flow and increasing infiltration rates. This study examined the storm-event based efficiency of GWWs at reducing runoff within an agricultural watershed of the US Midwest using the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP). Reductions in runoff volume in a representative field increased by 9 times as the length of the GWW increased. GWW efficiency was governed by the hydrology, expressed as Qpeak. The GWWs were more efficient during events with smaller Qpeak values, while the efficiency decreased during larger events. Building on these simulations for a single hillslope, a standardized hydrologic analysis was conducted in the watershed using established hydrologic modeling techniques (i.e., WIN TR-20) to quantify and mitigate potential flooding impacts for the entire watershed. The outcome of this study was to identify and quantify the management practices (e.g., conversion to grass or no-till) and detention structures needed to mitigate large flood events in the watershed. The results suggested that detention structures located along the stream channel corridor were most effective with the landscape changes as a secondary effort. A high level of land use conversion was needed to produce significant runoff reductions. Average reductions in runoff volumes of about 12% were observed for a 25% conversion of agricultural land to grasslands, with about an average 15% reduction for a 50% conversion. However, these land conversions will likely decrease sediment loads in the streams, which can extend the lifespan of the detention structures by preventing siltation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPapanicolaou, T., Elhakeem, M., Wilson, C. G., Dermisis, D. C., & Abaci, O. (2010, December). Evaluating the impacts on runoff of landscape-based Best Management Practices in a rain-fed agroecosystem of the US Midwest. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts (Vol. 2010, pp. EP41B-0706).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://edms.wexl.in/handle/1/3114
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherADSen_US
dc.subjectLand cover changeen_US
dc.subjectGeomorphology: hillslopeen_US
dc.subjectHydrological cycles and budgetsen_US
dc.subjectSediment transporten_US
dc.titleEvaluating the impacts on runoff of landscape-based Best Management Practices in a rain-fed agroecosystem of the US Midwesten_US
dc.title.alternativeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: