Corrective Justice and Deterrence: Can They Co-Exist

dc.contributor.author	Al-Tawil, Tareq
dc.date.accessioned	2023-09-21T06:16:26Z
dc.date.available	2023-09-21T06:16:26Z
dc.date.issued	2013
dc.description	The measure of compensatory damages for breach of contract is limited to the claimant's direct and/or consequential loss, which may flow from the violation of his right to performance.
dc.description.abstract	Restitutionary justice and deterrence have completely different types of justification. Although deterrence and restitutionary justice are quite different, this does not prevent the two from sharing the same means to their different ends, namely, stripping the defendant of the gain which he has made from his breach of contract and awarding it to the claimant. But the crucial question is: how can these diverse ideas be joined in a coherent unified theory? This article aims to deliver a mixed theory of restitutionary justice and deterrence in contract law. keywords: The theory of corrective justice, The normative quality ,Contract law	en
dc.identifier.citation	Al-Tawil, T. (2013). Corrective Justice and Deterrence: Can They Co-Exist. Eur. J. Legal Stud., 6, 139.‏	en
dc.identifier.other	https://hdl.handle.net/1814/28732
dc.identifier.uri	https://dspace-uat.adu.ac.ae/handle/1/14
dc.language.iso	en
dc.publisher	HeinOnline
dc.title	Corrective Justice and Deterrence: Can They Co-Exist
dc.type	Article

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1