A comparison of transfer learning performance versus health experts in disease diagnosis from medical imaging

dc.contributor.authorMalik, Hassaan
dc.contributor.authorShoaib Farooq, Muhammad
dc.contributor.authorKhelifi, Adel
dc.contributor.authorAbid, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorETAL;
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-11T11:49:39Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-19T08:18:26Z
dc.date.available2022-04-11T11:49:39Z
dc.date.available2023-08-19T08:18:26Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.description.abstractDeep learning methods have huge success in task specific feature representation. Transfer learning algorithms are very much effective when large training data is scarce. It has been significantly used for diagnosis of diseases in medical imaging. This article presents a systematic literature review (SLR) by conducting a comparison of a variety of transfer learning approaches with healthcare experts in diagnosing diseases from medical imaging. This study has been compiled by reviewing research studies published in renowned venues between 2014 and 2019. Moreover, the data for the diagnosis performed by health care experts has also been acquired to perform a detailed comparative analysis for a wide range of diseases. The analysis has been performed on the basis of diseases, transfer learning approaches, type of medical imaging used. The comparative analysis is based on performance indices reported in studies which include diagnostic accuracy, true-positive (TP), false-positive (FP), true-negative (TN), false-negative (FN) sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). A total of5,188articles were identified out of which 63 studies were included. Among them 21 research studies contain sufficient data to construct the evaluation tables that enable process of test accuracy of transfer learning having sensitivity ranged from 71% to 100% (mean 85.25%) and specificity ranged from 64% to 100% (mean 81.92%). Furthermore, health experts having sensitivity ranged from 33% to 100% (mean 85.27%) and specificity ranged from 82% to 100% (mean 91.63%).This SLR found that diagnostic accuracy of transfer learning is approximately equivalent to the diagnosis of health experts. The results also revealed that convolutional neural networks (CNN) have been extensively used for disease diagnosis from medical imaging. Finally, inappropriate exposure of diseases in transfer learning studies restricts reliable elucidation of the outcomes of dia...en_US
dc.identifier.citationMalik, H., Farooq, M. S., Khelifi, A., Abid, A., Qureshi, J. N., & Hussain, M. (2020). A comparison of transfer learning performance versus health experts in disease diagnosis from medical imaging. IEEE Access, 8, 139367-139386.‏en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3004766
dc.identifier.urihttps://edms.wexl.in/handle/1/3194
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.subjectTransfer learningen_US
dc.subjectHeath expertsen_US
dc.subjectDiseaseen_US
dc.subjectMedical imagingen_US
dc.titleA comparison of transfer learning performance versus health experts in disease diagnosis from medical imagingen_US
dc.title.alternativeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A Comparison of Transfer Learning Performance.pdf
Size:
7.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: